278,774 negotiated rates on file. Sixty-three carry the percentile figures CMS has required since April.
Measured from Livingston Hospital and Healthcare Services' own published price transparency file under 45 CFR Part 180.50 and 180.60, retrieved Sep 18, 2026.
| Facility | Host domain | cms-hpt.txt | Filename | Schema | Last updated | HTTP last-mod | Type 2 NPI | Attester | Payers | Rows | Rows w/ rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Livingston Hospital and Healthcare Services | lhhs.org | YES | standardcharges | unspecified | 8/25/2026 | Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:09:27 GMT | YES | Dan Klidzejs | 15 | 278,774 | 278,774 |
SHARE OF EACH FILE CARRYING A PAYER-SPECIFIC RATE
Only 63 of 278,774 rows carry this year's required percentile figures
The CY2026 update requires the median, 10th and 90th percentile allowed amounts, sourced from 835 remittance data, alongside every payer-specific rate. Just 63 rows, about 0.02%, carry any of the three fields.
100% of rows carry a real negotiated dollar amount
All 278,774 rows carry an actual dollar figure across 15 payers, no percentage or algorithm placeholders anywhere in the file. That's the harder half of the requirement, fully done.
The attester matches the CMS contact of record
Dan Klidzejs is named as both the attester in the file and the contact email on the CMS filing, so there's one clear owner rather than two people to reconcile.
Is the median/percentile gap a data availability issue, or simply the next item in queue after a dollar-rate filing that's already complete?
A hospital that got the harder half (real dollar rates across 15 payers) fully done has clearly already built a working process for this filing. The percentile fields may be closer than the raw percentage suggests.
FLAGGED, NOT ASSERTED — COULD NOT BE VERIFIED FROM OUTSIDE THE ORGANIZATION